[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [dvd-discuss] Sen. Hatch supports remote destruction



I thought that a reform had been passed during the
"republican revolution" where Congress had to put
up w/ the same laws as the rest of us (in particular
regarding sexual harassment & hiring practices, but I
had thought it was a general thing...) ?


-- 
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com

186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!



> -----Original Message-----
> From: microlenz@earthlink.net [mailto:microlenz@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:18 PM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Sen. Hatch supports remote destruction
> 
> 
> On 23 Jun 2003 at 8:53, John Zulauf wrote:
> 
> Date sent:      	Mon, 23 Jun 2003 08:53:59 -0600
> From:           	"John Zulauf" <johnzu@ia.nsc.com>
> To:             	dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject:        	Re: [dvd-discuss] Sen. Hatch supports 
> remote destruction
> Send reply to:  	dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Michael A Rolenz wrote:
> > > 
> > > Amazing what a little faux pax will do for a politician. At his
> > > website you now see this in the page source
> > 
> > the only long term effect will be for Congress to vote 
> itself exemptions
> > from copyright, anti-circumvention, et. al.  They've done 
> it before for
> > affirmative action, sexual harassment and the like.
> 
> 
> All animals are equal but some are more equal than others 
> (ANimal Farm)
> > 
> > .002
> > 
> > "who watches the watchers?"
> > 
> 
> 
>