[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Sen. Hatch supports remote destruction
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Sen. Hatch supports remote destruction
- From: "Richard Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:06:44 -0700
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Thread-index: AcM59ypaxv2T7p0ZSAmmNEoNAJCkaAAc03Fg
- Thread-topic: [dvd-discuss] Sen. Hatch supports remote destruction
I thought that a reform had been passed during the
"republican revolution" where Congress had to put
up w/ the same laws as the rest of us (in particular
regarding sexual harassment & hiring practices, but I
had thought it was a general thing...) ?
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: microlenz@earthlink.net [mailto:microlenz@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:18 PM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Sen. Hatch supports remote destruction
>
>
> On 23 Jun 2003 at 8:53, John Zulauf wrote:
>
> Date sent: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 08:53:59 -0600
> From: "John Zulauf" <johnzu@ia.nsc.com>
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Sen. Hatch supports
> remote destruction
> Send reply to: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>
> >
> >
> > Michael A Rolenz wrote:
> > >
> > > Amazing what a little faux pax will do for a politician. At his
> > > website you now see this in the page source
> >
> > the only long term effect will be for Congress to vote
> itself exemptions
> > from copyright, anti-circumvention, et. al. They've done
> it before for
> > affirmative action, sexual harassment and the like.
>
>
> All animals are equal but some are more equal than others
> (ANimal Farm)
> >
> > .002
> >
> > "who watches the watchers?"
> >
>
>
>