[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Sen. McCain, the RIAA and Verizon DMCA issue
- To: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Sen. McCain, the RIAA and Verizon DMCA issue
- From: "aicra(at)well.com" <aicra(at)well.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 14:27:48 -0400
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
ok, I see, it was a centralized server... like napster, at least that's
what the article states...so in that case, yes, DMCA.
Original Message:
-----------------
From: aicra@well.com aicra@well.com
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 14:16:53 -0400
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
Subject: [dvd-discuss] Sen. McCain, the RIAA and Verizon DMCA issue
According to the article, Sen Brownback wanted to amend the FTC bill
requiring that DMCA subpoenas can only be issued AFTER copyright holder
filed a court case or civil action. This was not set in motion because
McCain said he would hold a hearing about the issue.
http://dc.internet.com/news/article.php/2225131
I don't know all the details of the Verizon case, But I'll BET those are
not DMCA issues at all, but rather AHRA issues. (and I'll keep bringing up
the AHRA until I see some kind of evidence to the contrary).
A computer is not a device specifically designed to store and record audio.
And if there was music trading for personal use p2p... legally, the AHRA
stands.
-marcia
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .