[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Sen. Hatch supports remote destruction
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Sen. Hatch supports remote destruction
- From: "Richard Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 17:04:38 -0700
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Thread-index: AcM1J7MTwoZhx/pcQa28i0HfdkCcWAABUxEQ
- Thread-topic: [dvd-discuss] Sen. Hatch supports remote destruction
Violating copyright laws and violating the DMCA are _not_ the same thing.
Vigilante actions are typically against the law -- law enforcement is in the hands of the police agencies, not the individual (or the corporations).
-Richard M. Hartman
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua Stratton [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 4:24 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [dvd-discuss] Sen. Hatch supports remote destruction
> > "There's no excuse for anyone violating copyright laws,''
> Hatch said.
> You know, all the time I'm feeling more and more as though we're all
> living in some sort of William Gibson novel.