RE: [dvd-discuss] Comments from the Judge in the 321 studios case

["aicra(at)well.com" <aicra(at)well.com>]

Actually, if the $999 version was a nonencrypted version of an encrypted
version... and the $999 version was created prior to the encryption of
$9.99 version or aside from the encrypted version, it would be a 'method'
of circumvention, not a device of circumvention..right? The $999 item
wouldn't need to be a TOOL... just the article prior or aside to the $9.99
item.

-marcia

Original Message:
-----------------
From: Richard Hartman hartman@onetouch.com
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:59:29 -0700
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Comments from the Judge in the 321 studios case


It could not work.  The $999 edition would be a
circumvention device, whose primary purpose is
to bypass the TPM on the $9.99 edition.


-- 
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com


> 


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .