[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Disney Does Self Destructing DVDs
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Disney Does Self Destructing DVDs
- From: "Richard Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:15:03 -0700
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Thread-index: AcM06xocBxiIz0VWRE2CK61F0aHY6QACNOPQ
- Thread-topic: [dvd-discuss] Disney Does Self Destructing DVDs
Moreover, it does not "provide access" to a work
-- it _prevents_ access after the time elapses.
-Richard M. Hartman
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roy Murphy [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 9:10 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Disney Does Self Destructing DVDs
> 'twas brillig when Richard Hartman scrobe:
> > I don't know that a chemical process qualifies as a Technical
> > Protection Measure under the DMCA.
> I think it's pretty clear that it does not qualify. Look at
> the statute.
> A TPM "'effectively controls access to a work' if the measure, in the
> ordinary course of its operation, requires the application of
> information, or a process or a treatment, with the authority of the
> copyright owner, to gain access to the work"
> The self-erasing DVD does not require the application of
> information or
> a process to accomplish its self-erasing function. All it requires is
> exposure to the air.
> Roy Murphy \ CSpice: A Mailing List for Clergy Spouses
> firstname.lastname@example.org \ http://www.panix.com/~murphy/CSpice.html