[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Comments from the Judge in the 321 studios case
- To: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Comments from the Judge in the 321 studios case
- From: Kurt Hockenbury <khockenb(at)stevens-tech.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:13:56 -0400
- In-reply-to: <3EEE1275.6975.1D981B@localhost>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 microlenz@earthlink.net wrote:
> And as I've argued before, works that are distributed with encryption should
> not be copyrighted
<DA>
Ok, so we offer two editions: the encrypted edition, for $9.99, and the
uncrypted edition, for $999. If you copy the (uncopyrightable) encrypted
edition, you infringe the encrypted edition.
</DA>
Or are you saying publishing a work with encryption removes an item from
copyright?