[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Petition for rational copyright law
- To: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Petition for rational copyright law
- From: Noah silva <nsilva(at)atari-source.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 09:48:50 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <3EDE4BF3.18463.26092E@localhost>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
>
> Or just require the seemingly hopelessly old fashioned requirment for having
> every work have a copyright notice with a date attached. Add XX years to the
> date and anyone can figure out when the copyright expires. While accountants
> and some intellectual property lawyers may proclaim life + n years a superior
> system, it fails the KISS test.
>
> The Berne Convention is a bad idea. The USA spent 100 years avoiding it and the
> wisdom of that is evident to anyone without a vested interest.ANY copyright
> scheme which requires a registry system will become hopelessly complicated to
> the point that noone can possibly know when copyright ends.
>
Why do you think this? The registry system could be incredibly
simple. Everyone registers their copyrights now, just that it's not as
organized or simple as it could be. I agree that every copyright should
be assigned a number, and be in an easily searchable database. Then when
a book or CD says "Copyright No. 76245674", you could hop on copyright.gov
and check out the details of the copyright, when it expires, when/how many
times it was renewed, owner transfers, etc.
thanks,
noah silva