[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: [dvd-discuss digest 2003] V #180

To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: [dvd-discuss digest 2003] V #180
From: "D. C. Sessions" <dvd(at)lumbercartel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 22:04:49 -0700
In-reply-to: <255195E927D0B74AB08F4DCB07181B904C55BF@exchsj1.onetouch.com>
References: <255195E927D0B74AB08F4DCB07181B904C55BF@exchsj1.onetouch.com>
Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Wednesday 16 April 2003 09:58 am, Richard Hartman wrote:
> The right is transferred with posession of
> the master recording?
>
> So a duplicating service gets the right
> to distribute my work -- and I do not --
> because they happen to store masters of my
> works for me?

Oh, it's better than that.  You sell party A the
copyright, and sell party B the master.  Now neither
can legally use the work!

References:
- RE: [dvd-discuss] Re: [dvd-discuss digest 2003] V #180
  - From: "Richard Hartman" <hartman@onetouch.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [dvd-discuss] Re: [dvd-discuss digest 2003] V #180
Next by Date: RE: [dvd-discuss] Re: [dvd-discuss digest 2003] V #180
Previous by thread: RE: [dvd-discuss] Re: [dvd-discuss digest 2003] V #180
Next by thread: RE: [dvd-discuss] Re: [dvd-discuss digest 2003] V #180
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread