[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dvd-discuss] Judge Tosses Tech Copyright Law Challenge

To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Judge Tosses Tech Copyright Law Challenge
From: Phil Gengler <phil(at)codeallday.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 01:08:44 -0400
In-reply-to: <200304102112.31573.dvd@lumbercartel.com>
References: <A224678706957745ADBB113EC0A2392C137E4E@postal.fcci-group.com> <200304102112.31573.dvd@lumbercartel.com>
Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030313

D. C. Sessions wrote:
> Is there an estoppel argument here?
> 

I do think this was an estoppel argument, at least according to 
something I read about the case @ 
http://sethf.com/censorware/legal/edelman_n2h2_hearing.php

References:
- RE: [dvd-discuss] Judge Tosses Tech Copyright Law Challenge
  - From: "Dean Sanchez" <DSANCHEZ@fcci-group.com>
- Re: [dvd-discuss] Judge Tosses Tech Copyright Law Challenge
  - From: "D. C. Sessions" <dvd@lumbercartel.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [dvd-discuss] Judge Tosses Tech Copyright Law Challenge
Next by Date: [dvd-discuss] RIAA Student Lawsuit + Microsoft Speculation
Previous by thread: Re: [dvd-discuss] Judge Tosses Tech Copyright Law Challenge
Next by thread: [dvd-discuss] RIAA Student Lawsuit + Microsoft Speculation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread