[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] OT: request for references
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] OT: request for references
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:56:10 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Here's Pamela Samuelson's website
A few references to the procd case
||"Richard Hartman" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent by: email@example.com
03/24/2003 09:32 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
Subject: [dvd-discuss] OT: request for references
On another list I am having a discussion with someone
who talks about "software consumer contracts" (by which
I believe they are referring to shrinkwrap and clickwrap).
I know discussions here in the past have pointed out the
legal flaws in considering these to be contracts. One of
which has to do with -- IIRC -- there is no negotiation
between the parties. Another has to do with "first sale"
superceeding the so-called license agreements printed
on the box.
Can anybody point me to either actual case law
or legal statute that shows where "software consumer
contracts" do not actually exist?
-Richard M. Hartman
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!