Sorry. You are right. The court decision dealt with the issuing of the preliminary injunction...which makes it even more bizarre a response to the LOC. Sayeth Lexmark "Librarian Of Congress. Thou hast no power over me for I have be declared preliminarily righteous by a Federal Court of Ken-tu-ky"
ANyone want to take a stab at rebuttal argumentation. The PDF file seems to be scanned in images rather than text (anyone OCR it?)
Sham Gardner <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent by: email@example.com
03/17/2003 08:20 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss]Lexmark Decision
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 08:00:43AM -0800, Michael A Rolenz wrote:
> Lexmark not only chose to write a volumous reply (28pages) but send this
> court decision double in size to the LOC saying
> "THe courts have decided so the legislature should keep their hands
> off"... remember that the USSC said the opposite in Eldred.
Have I missed the final decision here? I thought the court had only issued a
preliminary injunction so far.
My (possibly somewhat old) version of acroread claims to be "unable to
decrypt" this file.
"There has to be a media outlet thats not run by corporations that build
a drum beat for war, corporations that profit from militarism and war,
but run by journalists and artists." (Lou Hill, Pacifica Radio founder)