[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Copyright v. Trademark
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Copyright v. Trademark
- From: "Richard Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:41:33 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Thread-index: AcLkZKcmR3iuKRaxQHmii5fajkABiAAdHD8Q
- Thread-topic: [dvd-discuss] Copyright v. Trademark
"Victor's _Little_ Secret"?
I don't think Victor chose a very ... compelling name for his shop ...
-Richard M. Hartman
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jolley [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:47 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Copyright v. Trademark
> PSYchiccr@aol.com wrote:
> > TM. Just look at what Easyjet are doing in Europe. Closing
> in on anyone with
> > the word easy in their company name. Even if they have
> existed long before
> > easyjet did.......
> I heard on NPR this week that Victoria's Secret lost their trademark
> infringement case against Victor's Little Secret. I think it was