[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] more dmca nonsense--Lexmark printers
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] more dmca nonsense--Lexmark printers
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:10:20 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Read the original complaint:
http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCA/20030108_lexmark_v_static_control_components.pdf
Lexmark is claiming that the handshake that the cartridge does with the software in the printer "controls access" to that software since it won't run if it doesn't get the handshake. And so by providing the handshake, Static Control is circumventing...truly bizarre