[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: TurboTax for free?
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: TurboTax for free?
- From: Ken Arromdee <arromdee(at)rahul.net>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:31:09 -0800 (PST)
- In-reply-to: <3E1C785A.C3E9F915@ia.nsc.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, John Zulauf wrote:
> Okay, quadruple indenting... ( the perl to convert a regular thread to
> this is below (and yes it does look like 'C' -- sorry Larry)
> Also, I'm doing my best at a DA argument I'm not fully convinced of
> (legally), I still think that ethically, one doesn't take advantage of
> fools, even fools with lots of money.
I don't know about that.
Assuming the argument is correct, the company is trying to cheat *you*, by
making an end-run around the part of the law which says that unsolicited
merchandise is a gift. Treating the CD as a gift is simply a refusal to be
cheated. The desires of the company have no ethical implication for you
since those desires are a part of the desire to cheat you.
It's like this scenario: A swindler offers me a game of 3 card monte, which
is really rigged. He wants me to win a dollar, get confident, gamble more,
and lose a hundred dollars. I realize the game is rigged, and deliberately
decide to quit after the first dollar. Do I have to give the dollar back,
since I obtained it by letting him try to cheat me but outsmarting him?