[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Gaming the system (was: Specific ironies of the CTEA)
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Gaming the system (was: Specific ironies of the CTEA)
- From: Jeremy Erwin <jerwin(at)ponymail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:34:06 -0500
- In-reply-to: <Pine.SGI.4.44.0212121938190.15382558-100000@attila.stevens-tech.edu>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 08:03 PM, Kurt Hockenbury wrote:
> [*] For that matter, this discrepancy means that in the case of music,
> where
> the song and the recording have seperate copyrights, the song
> belonging to the
> author and the recording to the studio, the two expire at different
> times
> unless the author dies exactly 25 years after recording. If the
> author dies
> earlier, the song enters the public domain before his or her recording
> does,
> by up to 25 years. On the other hand, if the author recorded young
> (say 15)
> but lives a long time (100, like Strom Thurman), then the recording
> will enter
> the public domain sixty years before the song does.
Interesting. Suppose the recording enters the public domain, before the
song does. Technically, the recording is a derivative work of the song.
If an individual chooses to distribute the now PD recording, could his
actions be thwarted by the songwriter's estate?
Jeremy