[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Specific ironies of the CTEA
- To: DVD-Discuss <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Specific ironies of the CTEA
- From: "D. C. Sessions" <dvd(at)lumbercartel.com>
- Date: 09 Dec 2002 20:29:14 -0700
- In-reply-to: <3DF520F9.5B4167B@ia.nsc.com>
- References: <3DF520F9.5B4167B@ia.nsc.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 16:02, John Zulauf wrote:
> I just stumbled over a specific irony of the CTEA. The 1951 Disney
> adaptation of Alice in Wonderland (it's beloved, but IMHO a hatchet job,
> no flames please... it's just my opinion) would have not be possible
> without Charles Dodgson's estates approval. Given the general
> unfaithfulness of the screen adaptation vs. the book this permission
> might have been difficult.
>
> Are there any other specific ironies like that? Anybody done a survey?
As long as you're Disneying, consider The Jungle Book:
Kipling wrote it in 1894, but lived to 1936. Therefore
under CTEA, Disney *still* couldn't make the movie for
another four years. As it was, they made it in 1967,
a mere 31 years after the death of the author (but
73 years after it was written.)
--
| It's the heart afraid of breaking that never learns to dance |
| It's the dream afraid of waking that never takes the chance |
| It's the one who won't be taken who cannot seem to give |
| and the soul afraid of dyin' that never learns to live |
+------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> -----------+