[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Hacking requires search warrant -- ruling
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Hacking requires search warrant -- ruling
- From: "Richard Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 09:04:02 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Thread-index: AcKPhopbVGL1R+DkRfmK93R2rU6oqQAZwlJA
- Thread-topic: [dvd-discuss] Hacking requires search warrant -- ruling
Sorry ... the RIAA does represent copyright holders,
so in negotiating both _to_ and _for_ the government
they have a substantial conflict of interest.
The fact that they have _additional_ conflicts
is secondary ;-)
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: D. C. Sessions [mailto:dcs@lumbercartel.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 8:43 PM
> To: DVD-Discuss
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Hacking requires search warrant -- ruling
>
>
> On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 11:59, Glendon M. Gross wrote:
> > It's almost as though the RIAA would become like a
> "Department of Art"
> > or "Department of Copyright Enforcement." I find it
> strange that there
> > is not more resistance to their point of view in the courts, but I
> > suspect that except for the EFF very few people are actively
> > representing the opposing view.
>
> Maybe the best thing to do is accept the RIAA's status as
> a quasi-governmental agency. There are any number of laws
> regulating the conduct of such agencies, and the Courts
> seem quite willing to apply them strictly. Wouldn't it be
> fun if the RIAA's meetings were covered by sunshine laws?
>
> > The RIAA often seems to win these kinds
> > of cases by "default." Content creators may need some kind of
> > representation in government but it should be an impartial
> > representation, not a partisan representation. Ultimately
> I don't think
> > the RIAA helps artists as much as they do mechanical reproducers of
> > music [and copyright owners] who often don't compensate the
> artist at all.
>
> Actually, the RIAA doesn't represent artists at all. (You're
> thinking ASCAP or BMI) The RIAA represents *publishers*, and
> on several occasions has represented them *against* artists.
> The RIAA, for instance, was behind the notorious "work for
> hire" law.
>
> --
> | The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. |
> | Because the slow, feeble old codgers like me cheat. |
> +--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> --------------+
>
>