[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] A TPM without use limitations -- thoughts?
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] A TPM without use limitations -- thoughts?
- From: "Peter D. Junger" <junger(at)samsara.law.cwru.edu>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:51:43 -0500
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:36:15 MST." <3DC1862F.1CD0D300@ia.nsc.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
"John Zulauf" writes:
: PoLR == "path of least resistance"
:
: I think PoLR is very much the case. Lazy infringers are caught because
: they don't remove the fingerprint, crafty infringers are caught
: eventually because "a city" or popular P2P net "set on a hill cannot be
: hidden" They are caught sooner if even one contributor forgets to remove
: the fingerprint and bring attention to the site/net. The crafty, high
: volume infringer is then in deep kimchee with the clear evidence of
: intent. The small, lazy, low volume infringer is shutdown with a quick
: C&D to the ISP. The lazy, high volume infringer goes down hard and fast
: (and earns a "Darwin Award" honorable mention).
:
: Remember, the whole point of a <em>reasonable scheme</em> is not to bust
: the purchaser of a work that is infringed, but stop those who traffic in
: the infringing copies themselves. The casual infringer get a C&D. Those
: who traffic grossly, get 33 months of Federally funded room and board
: with the DrinkOrDie 133T kR3W.
:
: Individually tagging files to users would utterly destroy the PoLR that
: gets brings a quick "cessation of hostilities" for the lazy infringer.
: If I know my privacy is at stake the PoLR is invalid, then I strip every
: work I own. Imagine if you will if they encoded your SSN or Amex # in
: the fingerprint. Removal would be a cron job ("Scheduled Task" for the
: *ix impaired.) on every host I own. The PoLR to bust the casual
: infringer is to make the fingerprint as useful (see previous Note 1) as
: possible, and as inoffensive as possible.
:
: Finally the PoLR for commercial vendors (musicmatch, MS, etc) is going
: to be "don't rock the boat" and therefore don't strip the fingerprint.
: The more applications make use of the fingerprint (for metadata hashing,
: etc)
But isn't converting to another format, which in many cases will be
protected as fair use, going to strip out the fingerprint? Especially
if the new format is a compressed one?
--
Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH
EMAIL: junger@samsara.law.cwru.edu URL: http://samsara.law.cwru.edu
NOTE: junger@pdj2-ra.f-remote.cwru.edu no longer exists