[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] A TPM without use limitations -- thoughts?
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] A TPM without use limitations -- thoughts?
- From: "Richard Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:46:58 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Thread-index: AcKAlA5gvyjBaKCCQ5a4G482CrtXVQAcSXsw
- Thread-topic: [dvd-discuss] A TPM without use limitations -- thoughts?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Wagner [mailto:daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu]
...
> If fingerprints are easily strippable, then I don't see how they are
> going to be a competitive alternative to DRM.
>
Path of least resistance.
DRM prevents copying, ergo you _have_ to remove it before
you can copy.
Fingerprints don't prevent copying. Since you don't _have_
to remove it to do what you want to do, most people won't
bother to do so.
The only thing I don't see is how they will associate
fingerprints w/ customers. Each CD would presumably
have the same fingerprint . . . now if they were selling
downloaded music over the internet, each customer could
not only get a differently "branded" copy but records
could be kept as to which customer a particular fingerprint
belonged to.
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!