[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dvd-discuss] Inexplicable

My apology. I stand corrected. Also, there's a Scots as well. 

BTW- you wrote "right here". Where is here? Physically? Or in 
"cyberspace"?




Tom <tom@lemuria.org>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
10/18/2002 01:32 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss

 
        To:     dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [dvd-discuss] Inexplicable


On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:41:23PM -0700, Michael A Rolenz wrote:
> Maybe true...but that is still no reason.....We'll try them in absentia 
in 
> the California Courts....and if they don't show up the courts can find 
> them all in contempt for not showing up! <sorry. I couldn't resist. The 
> Stupidity of the California Court system in the case of Matt P. still 
> ticks me off>

Why go to Matt when you're talking about germans and have a german who
_was_ tried in that california court right here? :)


The actual procedure was not a contempt of court thing, but rather a 
so-called "entry of default" aka "we find you guilty because you didn't 
fly halfway across the globe for us". 
In my eyes, that's at least as stupid.

-- 
http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub  1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <tom@lemuria.org>
     Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4  29B2 BF01 9FA1 2D7A 04F5