[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Sklyarov denied Visa to return to US for trial.
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Sklyarov denied Visa to return to US for trial.
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:10:41 -0700
- Cc: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I wouldn't blame him either, but I think
he _wants_ to go through with this to
help break the DMCA into little bitty pieces.
Or, at least, I hope so.
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael A Rolenz [mailto:Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 12:58 PM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Cc: 'dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu';
> owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Sklyarov denied Visa to return to US for
> trial.
>
>
> Yes....at this point, I can see no reason WHY Sklyarov would want to
> return to the USA. He's being a really good sport about
> coming back to
> testify in a foreign country that incarcerated him for 5
> months without
> bail that NOW doesn't want to issue him the papers to do that....My
> attitude would be "OK guys...when you get your act together
> MAYBE I'll
> come and testify or maybe not. The Russian Ambassador can
> tell you where
> to stick your summons in the mean time"
>
>
>
>
> Richard Hartman <hartman@onetouch.com>
> Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> 10/16/2002 10:57 AM
> Please respond to dvd-discuss
>
>
> To: "'dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu'"
> <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
> cc:
> Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Sklyarov denied
> Visa to return to US for trial.
>
>
> Thing is, he apparently was planning on coming -- it was
> the US rep that denied the application.
>
> --
> -Richard M. Hartman
> hartman@onetouch.com
>
> 186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael A Rolenz [mailto:Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:05 AM
> > To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> > Cc: DVD-Discuss; owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> > Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Sklyarov denied Visa to return to US for
> > trial.
> >
> >
> > OTOH if Skylarov never wants to set foot in the USofA again,
> > they can go
> > pound salt...unless the CIA wants to mount a covert operation
> > to abduct
> > him and ship him to the USA. What's more important? Terrorism or
> > Intellectual Property? ;-)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "D. C. Sessions" <dcs@lumbercartel.com>
> > Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> > 10/16/2002 09:51 AM
> > Please respond to dvd-discuss
> >
> >
> > To: DVD-Discuss <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
> > cc:
> > Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Sklyarov denied
> > Visa to return to US for trial.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 09:41, Richard Hartman wrote:
> > > I should think that it is up to the Justice Department
> > > to step on toes to get the visa granted. I assume he
> > > is under subpoena to appear, so they can issue court
> > > orders requireing the INS to grant the visa, can't they?
> >
> > Presumably Counsel could get the Court to issue a bench
> > order directing the INS to grant the visa. The lawyers
> > can comment but AFAIK courts are pretty straightforward
> > about motions for orders to enforce the Court's other
> > orders (e.g. subpoena.)
> >
> > --
> > | The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to
> the strong. |
> > | Because the slow, feeble old codgers like me cheat.
> |
> > +--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com>
> --------------+
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>