[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Sklyarov denied Visa to return to US for trial.
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Sklyarov denied Visa to return to US for trial.
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:05:14 -0700
- Cc: DVD-Discuss <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>, owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
OTOH if Skylarov never wants to set foot in the USofA again, they can go
pound salt...unless the CIA wants to mount a covert operation to abduct
him and ship him to the USA. What's more important? Terrorism or
Intellectual Property? ;-)
"D. C. Sessions" <dcs@lumbercartel.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
10/16/2002 09:51 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: DVD-Discuss <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
cc:
Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Sklyarov denied Visa to return to US for trial.
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 09:41, Richard Hartman wrote:
> I should think that it is up to the Justice Department
> to step on toes to get the visa granted. I assume he
> is under subpoena to appear, so they can issue court
> orders requireing the INS to grant the visa, can't they?
Presumably Counsel could get the Court to issue a bench
order directing the INS to grant the visa. The lawyers
can comment but AFAIK courts are pretty straightforward
about motions for orders to enforce the Court's other
orders (e.g. subpoena.)
--
| The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. |
| Because the slow, feeble old codgers like me cheat. |
+--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> --------------+