RE: [dvd-discuss] Copyright Office to Consider Anticircumvention Exemptions

[Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>]

Then Eric's wish exception of "- any protection measure 
that denies access based on information other 
than the user's posession of a legal copy of the work"
would be disqualified because it does not designate
a class of work, it designates a protection measure.


-- 
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com

186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!



> -----Original Message-----
> From: James S. Tyre [mailto:jstyre@jstyre.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:18 PM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Copyright Office to Consider
> Anticircumvention Exemptions
> 
> 
> At 01:04 PM 10/11/2002 -0700, Richard Hartman wrote:
> >Are the "classes" classes of works, or classes
> >of circumstances?
> 
> 
> Classes of works.
> 
> For those considering commenting, it would be helpful to 
> review the results 
> of the last rulemaking round, learn from it.
> http://www.loc.gov/copyright/fedreg/65fr64555.html
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> James S. Tyre                               mailto:jstyre@jstyre.com
> Law Offices of James S. Tyre          310-839-4114/310-839-4602(fax)
> 10736 Jefferson Blvd., #512               Culver City, CA 90230-4969
> Co-founder, The Censorware Project             http://censorware.net
>