[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Salon Artice on DVD Commentary
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Salon Artice on DVD Commentary
- From: "Steve Hosgood" <steve(at)caederus.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:19:45 +0100
- In-reply-to: <E06ADA0073926048AD304115DD8AB6BC01239840@mail.onetouch.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Richard M. Hartman wrote:
> Just a short step from "legitimate" commentary
> to MST3K-style ... and then what have you got?
> Essentially the same thing we've been discussing
> about inserting third-party material directly
> into the flick ...
>
If doing a downloadable MST3K-type commentary (or whatever) is supposedly
illegal, how do people get away with *selling* books like "Slayer: An Expanded
and Updated Unofficial and Unauthorized Guide to Buffy the Vampire Slayer(*)"?
Seems to me to be the paper equivalent to doing what is being proposed for
downloadable playlists or commentaries. The copyrighted original work is *not*
distributed (but is mentioned in the title of course), and you'd have to go
out and *buy* a copy of that work in order to make real use of the unauthorised
add-on. The copyright holder sells more copies, even if they don't approve of
the contents of the add-on.
Seems that the copyright holder can't even sue to remove the name of the
copyrighted work from the title of the add-on either, or I'm sure they would
in many cases.
(*) See Amazon for details:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0753506319/qid=1033132078/sr=1-10/ref=sr_1_10/002-4869074-2680818?v=glance
--
Steve Hosgood |
steve@caederus.com | "A good plan today is better
Phone: +44 1792 203707 + ask for Steve | than a perfect plan tomorrow"
Fax: +44 70922 70944 | - Conrad Brean
--------------------------------------------+
http://tallyho.bc.nu/~steve | ( from the film "Wag the Dog" )