[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Salon Artice on DVD Commentary
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Salon Artice on DVD Commentary
- From: "Steve Hosgood" <steve(at)caederus.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:38:55 +0100
- In-reply-to: <E06ADA0073926048AD304115DD8AB6BC01239840@mail.onetouch.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
> > From: Ernest Miller [mailto:ernest.miller@aya.yale.edu]
> >
> > http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2002/09/25/dvd_comment
> > ary/index.html
> >
> Just a short step from "legitimate" commentary
> to MST3K-style ... and then what have you got?
> Essentially the same thing we've been discussing
> about inserting third-party material directly
> into the flick ...
>
Worth noting that this forum has dealt with this subject matter before,
and well predating the June 2001 date mentioned in the Salon article too!
Check out http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/archive/dvd-discuss/msg12105.html
et al...
OK, so that thread was more concerned with the technicalities, but I think
the legal aspects were mentioned at least a few times. Mostly though to
do with using the "obvious legality" of doing your own DVD commentaries
to try and show legitimate uses for linux DVD players employing non-DVDCCA
authorised decryption algorithms.
--
Steve Hosgood |
steve@caederus.com | "A good plan today is better
Phone: +44 1792 203707 + ask for Steve | than a perfect plan tomorrow"
Fax: +44 70922 70944 | - Conrad Brean
--------------------------------------------+
http://tallyho.bc.nu/~steve | ( from the film "Wag the Dog" )