[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dvd-discuss] CA Supreme Court hears Pavlovich Jurisdiction Challengein DVDCCA case

NO...they will go after the importer that WalMart uses. You can bet that 
Sam is probably going to hedge his bets and not do it directly.




Tom <tom@lemuria.org>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
09/09/2002 08:39 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss

 
        To:     dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [dvd-discuss] CA Supreme Court hears Pavlovich Jurisdiction Challenge 
in DVDCCA case


On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:32:06AM -0400, Ole Craig wrote:
>                Moreover, they don't have to sue the manufacturer -- all 
they
> have to do is invoke 1701's "trafficking" clause to nail any would-be
> importers.

Let me get this straight: The MPAA is going to sue, say, WalMart over
selling ("trafficking") cheap DVD players?


-- 
PGP/GPG key: http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub  1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <tom@lemuria.org>
     Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4  29B2 BF01 9FA1 2D7A 04F5