[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Copyright term only increased twice
- To: DVD-Discuss <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Copyright term only increased twice
- From: "D. C. Sessions" <dcs(at)lumbercartel.com>
- Date: 08 Aug 2002 19:40:05 -0700
- In-reply-to: <3D52C52E.7381.3F3AB7@localhost>
- References: <3D52C52E.7381.3F3AB7@localhost>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 19:23, microlenz@earthlink.net wrote:
> On 8 Aug 2002 at 13:44, Bryan Taylor wrote:
> > This argument proves what it intends to refute: Congress has made it clear that
> > it will not allow any more works to enter the public domain.
>
> Excellent point. THey continued to make a bunch of little changes - NINE. to
> prevent what would have happened in the course of events (certainly, Hemingway
> or Fitzgerald would not even know or care) I think that just about
> demonstrates the contempt Congress has for the public domain...
In all seriousness, I propose that we back legislation that
takes their "some copyright good, more better" argument to
its logical conclusion: a retroactive extension to 1789.
--
| May I have the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, |
| the strength to change the things I cannot accept, and the |
| cunning to hide the bodies of those who got in my way. |
+------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> -----------+