RE: [dvd-discuss] Senate Judiciary Report on content protection - WHAT dothoseguys drink/smoke/shoot/snort....?

["Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>]

I stand corrected...the title should have been "MPAA report to Senate 
Judiciary on content protection-what do thoseguys drink/smoke/shoot/snort? 
" of course now I know the answer - It's HOLLYWOOD!"




"Ballowe, Charles" <CBallowe@usg.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
05/28/2002 03:05 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss

 
        To:     "'dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: [dvd-discuss] Senate Judiciary Report on content protection - WHAT do 
thoseguys drink/smoke/shoot/snort....?


Just as a note, it is an MPAA report to the senate judiciary committee,
not one generated by the senate. Not that the senate doesn't buy it 
hook, line, and sinker, but I won't blame them for the origin.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael A Rolenz [mailto:Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 4:57 PM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: [dvd-discuss] Senate Judiciary Report on content protection -
> WHAT do thoseguys drink/smoke/shoot/snort....?
> 
> 
> From
> 
> http://judiciary.senate.gov/special/content_protection.pdf
> 
> Status: Watermark Detection and Response in A/D Converters
> As noted, the selection of a watermark is only the first step 
> in plugging 
> the analog hole. Subsequently, a cross-industry forum must be 
> created or 
> chosen in determining how and under what compliance framework 
> watermark 
> detection and response would take place in A/D converters.
> 
> What hydrocephalic came up with this one?
>