[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dvd-discuss] Blizzard / Battlenet FAQ

To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Blizzard / Battlenet FAQ
From: Ron Gustavson <rongusss(at)mediaone.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:13:43 -0500
In-reply-to: <OFC5FD2259.4E63105A-ON86256B68.005822FE@smithmicrotech.com>
References: <OFC5FD2259.4E63105A-ON86256B68.005822FE@smithmicrotech.com>
Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu

On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:05:14 -0600, tneu@smithmicrotech.com wrote:

>!@#$%.
>
>The Intellectual Property Peddlers did it again.   They got me riled up
>enough to write another anti-FAQ.
>
>As usual, please post any recommended improvements.
>
>http://www.visi.com/~tneu/blizzard.html
>

Isn't it time to declare all port numbers to be in the public domain.
It seems so obvious, but these days...

I don't know which port bnetd uses, but if Blizzard wants to remove that 
port from the public domain, the public should reclaim the port.

        __________NO-&infin;-DO__________

References:
- [dvd-discuss] Blizzard / Battlenet FAQ
  - From: tneu@smithmicrotech.com

Prev by Date: RE: [dvd-discuss] Thoughts on Posner and Landes (was Re: Eldred v. AshcroftAccepted ...)
Next by Date: [dvd-discuss] FC: California Sup. Court will hear DVDCCA "trade secret" DeCSS case
Previous by thread: Re: [dvd-discuss] Blizzard / Battlenet FAQ
Next by thread: RE: [dvd-discuss] Blizzard / Battlenet FAQ
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread