[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Eldred v. Ashcroft Accepted forReviewbySCOTUS
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Eldred v. Ashcroft Accepted forReviewbySCOTUS
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:43:26 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott A Crosby [mailto:crosby@qwes.math.cmu.edu]
...
>
> (BTW, what right does disney have *at all* to Mickey Mouse
> nowadays? Why
> must any 'solution' seem to require that there's some exception that
> allows Disney to control Mickey Mouse forever?
>
Properly, they don't. But recognizing reality, they've got enough $$$
and are going to work _something_ with congress to get what they want.
I'm just considering ways to control the damage, since I do not believe
that it can be avoided completely.
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!