[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Eldred v. Ashcroft Accepted for Review by SCOTUS
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Eldred v. Ashcroft Accepted for Review by SCOTUS
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:12:59 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael A Rolenz [mailto:Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org]
...
>
>
> I can just hope SCOTUS has read their Macauley....if more
> people accessed
> the public domain, or had access to it, they might discover
> just what it's
> for and why as well as how relevant much of it really is. . Macauley,
> which is available online for free, has more to say about
> copyright and is
> more entertaining to read than any of the drivel found on the
> WIPO website
The Macauley speches can be found here:
http://yarchive.net/macaulay/copyright.html
Apparently we owe thanks to Jerry Pournelle for posting
them, according to an entry in his web site's mail column.
(At least, the version posted at the URL mentioned above
... he apparently extracted the two Macauley speeches from
a larger file from the gutenberg archives, and added a bit
of HTML formatting)
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!