[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[dvd-discuss] Eldred v. Ashcroft Accepted for Review by SCOTUS
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: [dvd-discuss] Eldred v. Ashcroft Accepted for Review by SCOTUS
- From: John Schulien <jms(at)uic.edu>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 18:38:49 -0600
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
> What's with the headline: "Supreme Court to Intervene in Internet
> Copyright Dispute"? Eldred may publish on the Internet, but the legal
> questions have nothing to do with the internet.
True, but practically, this case will decide the future of
peer-to-peer. If Eldred prevails, an enormous volume
of older works -- mostly songs and movies -- will become
legally available for Napster-type file-sharing.
Dead-tree and silver-disc publishing, distribution, and
marketing of public domain works is an expensive, difficult
undertaking -- very hard to pull off while making a profit.
However, as Napster showed, there are plenty of people
who will make an incremental contribution of their personal
favorite works, without expectation of profit.
Internet publishing of public domain works is a easy as
getting DSL and installing a web server on your PC.
As Napster showed, the internet is the future of
non-commercial distribution of works.
So yes, this case isn't directly internet related, but the
practical implications of the re-introduction of copyright
expiration fall mostly in the realm of the internet.