Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF: Security Researchers Drop Scientific Censo rshipCase

["Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>]

Posting from last week attached at the bottom.

In this particular case, the RIAA cannot sue Felton et al because they 
have publically stated they will not...that does not apply to anyone else 
per se since this is not a court ruling.




Eric Seppanen <eds@reric.net>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
02/06/02 10:47 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss

 
        To:     dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF: Security Researchers Drop Scientific Censo rship 
Case


On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:30:32PM -0500, Peter D. Junger wrote:
> : > >San Francisco - Citing assurances from the government, the
> : They _believed_ them !??!? 
> 
> It's not so much a matter of believing them as estopping them.

Can someone clarify exactly how estoppel works in this case?  Do RIAA's
informal assurances provide a solid legal defense for the next academic
who wants to publish RIAA's dirty secrets?


==================


----- Forwarded by Michael A Rolenz/West/Aerospace/US on 02/06/02 01:21 PM 
-----


"Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
01/24/02 09:48 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss

 
        To:     dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: [dvd-discuss] Good AiboPet Hacker - DMCA story in Sci Am


Estoppel: A rule of evidence whereby a person is barred from denying the 
truth of a fact that has already been settled -Also denying ones previous 
actions or words. 

Essentually, your previous actions or statements or settlements cannot be 
repudiated. The best example is where there is a minor breach of contract 
and because it is minor, the other party continues with the contract. At 
the conclusion, the party that suffered the breach cannot sue the other 
for a breach of contract because they were aware of the breach and 
accepted it. They are estopped from sueing for a breach of contract. 


Try a search on estoppel and interetingly enough the same paragraph pops 
up EVERYWHERE.

Nothing contained in this Legal Notice shall be construed as conferring by 

implication, estoppel, or any
 other legal theory, a license or right to any patent, trademark, 
copyright, or other intellectual property right,
 except those expressly provided herein. The products, processes, 
software, and other technology
 described at this website may be the subject of other intellectual 
property rights owned by Altera or by third
 parties, and no licenses are granted herein.




Richard Hartman <hartman@onetouch.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
01/24/02 09:22 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss

 
        To:     "'dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu'" 
<dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: [dvd-discuss] Good AiboPet Hacker - DMCA story 
in Sci Am




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael A Rolenz [mailto:Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:56 AM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Good AiboPet Hacker - DMCA story in Sci Am
> 
> 
> "The DMCA remains the law of the land and what AiboPet does 
> breaks it. 
> Sony
>  retains its right to crack down on AiboPet and others like him, but 
> chooses not
>  to exercise it, for now."
> 
> OK.....how does the doctrine of estoppel apply here?
> 

You take the estoppel out of the bottle and take a few
big swigs?

Perhaps you could give a brief description, for the 
non-lawspeak-enabled what "the doctrine of estoppel"
is? 



-- 
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com

186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!