[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[dvd-discuss] Discourse on DRMs - Responsibilities, Requirements, Ramblings
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: [dvd-discuss] Discourse on DRMs - Responsibilities, Requirements, Ramblings
- From: "Roy Murphy" <murphy(at)panix.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:27:02 -0500
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
'Twas brillig when Michael A Rolenz scrobe:
> Consider then, that unlike ARM, DRMs act as a proxy for the publisher
> (NOT the copyright holder as has been pointed out earlier in this
> list). Each time I access something with a DRM, some form of remote
> authentication occurs. The publisher using a DRM must ensure that for
> those "authorized", access cannot be revoked (This is personal
> property. Not rental or pay for view) regardless of the condition of
> the work. Again ...how long...until copyright runs out?
So, I guess the acronym DRM *really* stands for Digital Rights
Misappropriation.
--
Roy Murphy \ CSpice -- A mailing list for Clergy Spouses
murphy@panix.com \ http://www.panix.com/~murphy/CSpice.html