[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Re:
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Re:
- From: "Jeremy A Erwin" <jerwin(at)gmu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:19:28 -0500
- In-reply-to: <OF78A44FA9.9C704EBD-ON88256B56.0070DBB7@aero.org>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 03:35 PM, Michael A Rolenz wrote:
> Other than being a watermark and probably more crytographically
> secure.....is this really much the same security model they had with
> DVDs
> using CSS = Trusted hardware? Or am I missing something in the
> announcement?
>
I realize that the SACD format is not part of the DVD spec, but could
anyone explain how SACD watermarking works?
Jeremy