[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dvd-discuss] More Elcomsoft/Sklyarov Motions

To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] More Elcomsoft/Sklyarov Motions
From: "Arnold G. Reinhold" <reinhold(at)world.std.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:42:36 -0500
In-reply-to: <E16WLpZ-0002X4-00@maynard.mail.mindspring.net>
References: <1e3e01c1a97d$8c436e00$230110ac@pavilion9995><Pine.SGI.4.33.0201291636450.13727970-100000@attila.stevens-tech.edu><1e3e01c1a97d$8c436e00$230110ac@pavilion9995><E16WLpZ-0002X4-00@maynard.mail.mindspring.net>
Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu

At 1:13 PM -0800 1/31/02, John Young wrote:
>Thanks to Kurt Foss we offer two additional dismissal motions by
>Elcom/Elcomsoft  and Dmitry Sklyarov,
>
>Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Indictment for Lack of Jurisdiction
>
>Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Count One: Conspiracy
>
>  http://cryptome.org/usa-v-esds-nmd.htm

If these motions are turned down, can they be appealed before the 
trial? It would seem that they and the expected motion to dismiss on 
First Amendment grounds contain all the meat in this case.

Arnold Reinhold

References:
- [dvd-discuss] 4 Studios to Issue Films in a High-End Video Format
  - From: "Ernest Miller" <ernest.miller@aya.yale.edu>
- [dvd-discuss] One member of Congress on our side.
  - From: Kurt Hockenbury <khockenb@stevens-tech.edu>
- [dvd-discuss] More Elcomsoft/Sklyarov Motions
  - From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>

Prev by Date: [dvd-discuss] Teach ACT OF2001 -NOTHING to do with Teaching but DMCA Tothe
Next by Date: [dvd-discuss] DCMA Criticism in SIAM News
Previous by thread: [dvd-discuss] More Elcomsoft/Sklyarov Motions
Next by thread: [dvd-discuss] DCMA Criticism in SIAM News
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread