[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] UK ruling against Playstation mods
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] UK ruling against Playstation mods
- From: Kurt Hockenbury <khockenb(at)stevens-tech.edu>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 11:00:20 -0500
- In-reply-to: <014401c1a4e6$f6fbb950$4df51eac@camboron>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Andy Oram wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer.One excerpt:
>
> Judge Jacob stated that Sony licensed games for the territory that they were
> issued, the licensing of these games did not allow for their use in other
> territories, therefore whether they were imported for private and domestic
> use by personal purchase for instance via the internet, or purchased abroad
> on holiday, they were not allowed by Sony to be played outside of the
> licensed territory, this argument should be upheld.
Bah. If only he could have followed the recent U.S. case example: if it looks
like a sale, and acts like a sale, it's a sale. People buying games from
abroad dont't "license" them. They purchase them. What they do after that is
their business, as long as they aren't distributing copies.
I was wondering this morning if we'd be better of if "copyright" were instead
named "copy distribution right". I should be allowed to make as many copies
as I like of anything that I own, as long as I don't distribute them.
-Kurt