[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] [openlaw] Government takes more extremelineinsecond"Eldred" case
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] [openlaw] Government takes more extremelineinsecond"Eldred" case
- From: "Peter D. Junger" <junger(at)samsara.law.cwru.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:20:03 -0500
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:12:57 PST." <OFE59CD513.C4A7A5F3-ON88256B42.00660315@aero.org>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
"Michael A Rolenz" writes:
: IT's worse than the assumptions that one makes are unrealistic. To be a
: tractable problem, they must simplify the problem (which they can't define
: completely anywise). The models must have things that can be
: measured-somehow even if it's not relevant (e.g. citations) Simplifying
: the situation also means that invariably some bias creeps in involving
: what is significant and what is not. (e.g, as the farm owners discovered
: after the application of broad spectrum insecticides, elimination of a
: pest to optimize yields may mean eliminating a pollinator that creates the
: yields). So one starts with a large multidimensional time varying
: nonlinear system and simplifies it to:
:
: One dimensional preferably and two or three at worst.
: Linear
: Time invariant
:
: Then one LOVES to optimize something. Well the only thing one can optimize
: is a function into one dimension. WHich means that ALL the other variables
: are eliminated (optimizing a weighted sum doesn't cut it...the weights are
: totally arbitrary and subjective)......Yes...doing Operations research and
: mathematical modeling is really fun stuff but one should not take it as
: established fact without reviewing the model
:
: (BTW- Posner's paper on obesity could be reduced to a couple of homework
: exercises for calculus students..."ASSUME a utility function of the form
: X^2..."...I'm not certain if he knows how to do calculus or just has a
: lousy wordprocessor)
Posner was an English major before he went to law school. I doubt that
he ever took calculus. Of course, one doesn't need to know calculus
to know that almost everything that is is claimed on the basis of
law-and-economic theory is nonsense---all one has to do is read something
about the ``problem of the second-best.''
I was an English major, too, but I did take a calculus sequence after
I started teaching law as part of my ``know your enemies program,'' the
enemies being those who were pushing law-and-econmics.
The enemies won.
--
Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH
EMAIL: junger@samsara.law.cwru.edu URL: http://samsara.law.cwru.edu
NOTE: junger@pdj2-ra.f-remote.cwru.edu no longer exists