[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Photocopying machine parts...
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Photocopying machine parts...
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:44:31 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
How about supercomputers? I read that the Prez. is allowing them to be
exported now to the 36 countries that the last administration banned to
prevent proliferation....of course...no other country would ever ever ever
think to use one to do encryption research would they?
"Arnold G. Reinhold" <reinhold@world.std.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
01/04/02 09:40 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
cc:
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Photocopying machine parts...
Krytrons have always been the poster child for dual-use technology
export controls. They have important civilian uses, but are
considered critical for building nuclear weapons. Nukes depend on the
simultaneous detonation of a number of conventional explosive charges
surrounding a fissionable material core, so a device that can switch
on detonator power quickly and precisely is essential. You can find
out more about export controls at http://www.bxa.doc.gov/
Arnold Reinhold
At 10:28 AM -0500 12/29/01, mickey wrote:
>... illegal for export?
>
>"Fugitive Physicist Pleads Guilty to Exporting Potential Nuclear
Triggers"
>
>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41821,00.html
>
>"The original 30-count indictment involved the alleged export of
>krytrons, two-inch devices that can be used in nuclear weapons or
>photocopying machines. A license or approval from the U.S. State
>Department must be obtained to ship them."
>
>Here is a (functional?) description of a krytron:
>
>http://www.ee.ualberta.ca/~schmaus/elect/pas5.html
>
>I guess that it might count as a dual-use high technology (in the
>early eighties?), but I didn't realize that photocopier parts
>distribution was potentially a federal crime if done without a
>permit.
>mickeym