[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Inspiration or infringement
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)lweb.law.harvard.edu>, dvd-discuss(at)lweb.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Inspiration or infringement
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 08:40:06 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
When did the last copyright expire (and what
year was it issued ... and what was the work)?
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: D. C. Sessions [mailto:dcs@lumbercartel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 10:01 PM
> To: dvd-discuss@lweb.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Inspiration or infringement
>
>
> On Wednesday 26 December 2001 20:26, Tom wrote:
>
> # I would like to extrapolate that for an argument along the
> lines of "at
> # the current speed, copyright will be 250 years in 2025".
> also, I would
> # like to find the year in which copyright becomes permanent (i.e. the
> # term is so long that the next extension happens before even
> the oldest
> # work expires).
>
> We're basically already there. Aside from the Reno gap (which was
> closed by statute and is now, as everyone knows, under litigation)
> no copyrights have expired in several decades, nor are any due to
> expire in the near future.
>
> Plenty of time for another extension.
>
> --
> | I'm old enough that I don't have to pretend to be grown up.|
> +----------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
>