[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [dvd-discuss] Interesting Spam v Free Speech Case


30,000 employees take 6 seconds each to delete email (obviously loyal 
Intel employees wouldn't read it once they know that intel didn't want 
them to read it.) 

This is 180,000 seconds of productivity lost (exercise for alert reader. 
the intel employee is reading email. are they really loosing that much 
productivity because of THIS email?)

180,000 sec = 50 hrs. 
Assuming the average Intel employee is paid $100/hr means that the company 
is out $5000 which is the limit of small claims in California.

I contend the ruling should be overturned because the matter was 
originally tried in the WRONG COURT ;-)

Richard Hartman <hartman@onetouch.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@lweb.law.harvard.edu
12/12/01 10:23 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss

        To:     "'dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss@lweb.law.harvard.edu>, 
dvd-discuss <dvd-discuss@lweb.law.harvard.edu>
        Subject:        RE: [dvd-discuss] Interesting Spam v Free Speech Case

This seems to be less of a spam issue and more of a harassment issue.

-Richard M. Hartman

186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryan Taylor [mailto:bryan_w_taylor@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 6:37 AM
> To: dvd-discuss
> Subject: [dvd-discuss] Interesting Spam v Free Speech Case
> This may be of interest to the crowd here because it is 
> another free speech on
> the internet case: Intel v. Hamidi
> http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/C033076.PDF
> Forwarded from posting on Declan's list:
> http://www.politechbot.com/p-02915.html
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
> your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
> or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com