[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dvd-discuss] close to the proverbial bone

To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] close to the proverbial bone
From: Sham Gardner <mail(at)risctaker.inka.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 17:12:35 +0100
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111061028030.2808-100000@hex.cs.umass.edu>; from olc@cs.umass.edu on Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 10:28:56AM -0500
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111061028030.2808-100000@hex.cs.umass.edu>
Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i

On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 10:28:56AM -0500, Ole Craig wrote:
> 
> RIAA Wants Background Checks on CD-RW Buyers
> 
> http://www.bbspot.com/News/2001/10/riaa.html

Is this genuine? When I first read it a few days ago, I dismissed it as a
parody.

-- 
http://sites.inka.de/risctaker/DeCSS/

"DVDCCA's statutory right to protect its economically valuable trade secret
is not an interest that is 'more fundamental' than the First Amendment right
to freedom of speech [...] Accordingly, we are compelled to reverse the
preliminary injunction." (California Appeals Court)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [dvd-discuss] close to the proverbial bone
  - From: Ole Craig <olc@cs.umass.edu>
- Re: [dvd-discuss] close to the proverbial bone
  - From: Tom <tom@lemuria.org>

References:
- [dvd-discuss] close to the proverbial bone
  - From: Ole Craig <olc@cs.umass.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [dvd-discuss] close to the proverbial bone
Next by Date: Re: [dvd-discuss] close to the proverbial bone
Previous by thread: [dvd-discuss] close to the proverbial bone
Next by thread: Re: [dvd-discuss] close to the proverbial bone
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread