[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Interesting 1st sale-shrinkwrap-EULA-(c) infrin gementcase
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Interesting 1st sale-shrinkwrap-EULA-(c) infrin gementcase
- From: Noah silva <nsilva(at)atari-source.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 12:29:25 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <E06ADA0073926048AD304115DD8AB6BC9D67F2@mail.onetouch.com>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
> >
>
> Because they didn't exist when the "no-rental" law was passed?
> When was that done, anyway?
>
Perhaps there is no difference. I think the copyright owner can allow
others to rent. My friend who works at blockbuster said the tapes they
buy to rent are hundreds of dollars each (for the same movie you can buy
for $20). So a Cd-Rental store could happen if the copyright holder
authorized you to rent the CDs.
-- noah silva