[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Interesting 1st sale-shrinkwrap-EULA-(c) infringementcase
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Interesting 1st sale-shrinkwrap-EULA-(c) infringementcase
- From: Jeme A Brelin <jeme(at)brelin.net>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 23:18:02 -0800 (PST)
- In-Reply-To: <E06ADA0073926048AD304115DD8AB6BC9D67F3@mail.onetouch.com>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Richard Hartman wrote:
> The same thing used to happen for VHS tapes. Some movies were "priced
> for sale" at around $20 and some were "priced for rental" at around
> $99. Few people wanted to fork over the $99 so they rented those
> movies instead.
What do you mean "used to"?
It's still a common practice.
J.
--
-----------------
Jeme A Brelin
jeme@brelin.net
-----------------
[cc] counter-copyright
http://www.openlaw.org