[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Bunner wins DeCSS trade secret appeal
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Bunner wins DeCSS trade secret appeal
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:33:47 -0800
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael A Rolenz [mailto:Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:34 PM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Bunner wins DeCSS trade secret appeal
>
>
> Picky
> Picky
> Picky
>
> ;-)
>
> <as I attempt to restrain my snickering>...Now lets consider this
> hypothetical....
>
> As Jeme has pointed out <repeatedly!>, if the sting of "1"s
> and "O"s are
> NOT expressing ideas, then they also CANNOT be copyrighted either,
> seemingly this court agrees. Now...lets add a little more to
> this line of
> argumentation. Take waht TWI just put forth down under- DVD are
> "software". Obviously it's not source code but little "1"s
> and "Os"....So
> TWI has just presented a legal argument that EVERYTHING they
> release on
> DVD is not copyrighted. A good question is how the courts try
> to deal with
> that problem.
>
Ouch! That makes just too much sense!
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!