[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] AVRA sues Warner Home Video
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] AVRA sues Warner Home Video
- From: Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:48:50 -0800
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Can anybody get a copy of TWI's submission? It might be an amusing
exercise to compare and contrast the various stances they have had in the
2600, the Ca DVDCCA, cases and now this one....at some point some judge
may want to ask TWI - "Look TWI, it can't be and not be so pick what it
is"...if nothing else, I'd love to read the legalese that argues that a
DVD really is a program!
"Baerwulf" <baerwulf@echidna.id.au>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
10/31/01 09:20 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
cc:
Subject: [dvd-discuss] AVRA sues Warner Home Video
Related to the Felten Case is this one reported in The West Australian
this
morning. The Australian Video Retailers Assoc. is suing Warner for
threatening to sue rental outlets who rented out the cheaper home versions
of DVDs
http://www.thewest.com.au/20011101/news/state/tw-news-state-home-sto30431.ht
ml
Australian Judges are known for supporting the little guy, this could be
an
interesting case.
The square root of three equals two for large values of three. - found in
a
bathroom in the Cornell Physics department