[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF opposes blacklisting spammers
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF opposes blacklisting spammers
- From: John Galt <galt(at)inconnu.isu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 00:02:12 -0600 (MDT)
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0110210832350.3690-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
- Mail-Followup-To: galt@inconnu.isu.edu
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Bryan Taylor wrote:
>
>> "Email is protected speech. There is a fundamental free speech right
>> to be able to send and receive messages, regardless of medium. Unless
>> that right is being abused by a particular individual, that individual
>> must not be restricted.
>
>Now wait a moment ... I agree that spammers have the right
>to free speech in public places, but you have to remember
>that my mailbox is private space, not public space.
>
>If I were to walk into the EFF offices and put on loud music,
>I'm sure they'd also ask me to take the music elsewhere so
>they could do some work ;)
Yes, but would they hire a pseudo-governmental entity to arbitrarily tell
people who're playing ANY music at all to shut it off, just because
someone's used that boom box before to play loud music?
>regards,
>
>Rik
>
--
Be Careful! I have a black belt in sna-fu!
Who is John Galt? galt@inconnu.isu.edu