[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] SSSCA Hearing on Oct. 25
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] SSSCA Hearing on Oct. 25
- From: Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 14:47:13 -0700
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
YOu forgot the jackbooted thugs enforcing it with the legal and police
systems behind them......
BTW - WTO has some interesting literature on copyright enforcement. In
less developed countries they "recommend" that it be treated as a criminal
offense with police roundups, seizures, sweeps of market places. Later on
as things get more "civilized" it can be treated as a civil offense....so
much for the uniformity of law
Tom <tom@lemuria.org>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
10/19/01 02:32 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
cc:
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] SSSCA Hearing on Oct. 25
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 04:55:54PM -0400, Noah silva wrote:
> You can always include the "security" features in the "free" (and I am
> assuming Open Source) software. Just make them conditional defines to
> it's easy to recompile it without even having to look at the code ;)
past experience (CSS) and background information (that WIPO workshop)
show clearly that the "certified" part will almost surely require:
a) obfuscation
b) a licensing structure
c) a central authority to oversee same
and c) will almost definitely be a "cross-industry non-profit group".
you know, like DVD CCA, for example.
--
-- http://web.lemuria.org
--