Re: Re[2]: [dvd-discuss] EFF opposes blacklisting spammers

[Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org]

Ole Craig <olc@cs.umass.edu>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
10/19/01 06:28 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss

 
        To:     Openlaw DMCA Forum <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: Re[2]: [dvd-discuss] EFF opposes blacklisting spammers


<stuff deleled>

>> We can teach against it, but some people are just going to do whatever
>> they please and we must respect their right to do so.

>                Bullshit. The flipside of a right to free speech is a 
right to
>not listen.

>                                Ole
>--
>Ole Craig * olc@cs.umass.edu * UNIX; postmaster, news, web; SGI martyr *
>CS Computing Facility, UMass * <www.cs.umass.edu/~olc/> for public key 

Respect their right to do what they please?  Then they have to take the 
consequences. If spam is a DoS attack, do we allow people to perform DoS 
attacks back? 
(BTW- the situation is similar to what radio was like before the they 
started coordinating it in the 20s.)

perl -e 'print$i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'