[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.
- To: Openlaw DMCA Forum <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.
- From: Jeme A Brelin <jeme(at)brelin.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0110181509380.17165-100000@sparcy.internal.lan>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Noah silva wrote:
> Yes, but how does that realistically apply? Let's say I own the
> copyright because I wrote it, and I'm protected by default. Still if
> I post something that I know if going to a public forum, I am
> implicitly giving permission (under my copyright control) for that
> item to be published. The difference is subtle (no protection rights
> vs having and waiving them.)
The issue was related to redistributing the work. I believe that our
current law would require permission from each poster to print and sell an
archive of this list.
Is that not the case?
Anyway, shouldn't be.
J.
--
-----------------
Jeme A Brelin
jeme@brelin.net
-----------------
[cc] counter-copyright
http://www.openlaw.org